Archive for the ‘cats’ Category

01
Sep

Victoria’s continuing bloodbath

Animal management can be a huge asset to its community; working to keep its public safe, offering a service that protects people and their animals and leading the way in compassion. Or it can work against its public, seeing them as an enemy that needs to be coerced with more laws, more fines and expanded powers to officers to seize and kill pets.

In 2008, there was recognition of a pet crisis in Victoria;

Reporter: There’s currently 10 times the average number of dogs looking for a new home. Staff are blaming pressure on family budgets for the increase, for some it’s just too expensive to collect their precious pooch.

Sue Conroy: If the dog’s going to cost them fines for being out with the council, or microchipping fees and desexing fees, then maybe they’ll opt not to take the dog back home again.


In 2010, despite the experience that fines are an obstacle that keep people from collecting their lost animals ensuring shelters stay perpetually full, and ignoring the global financial meltdown which has stretched families even further than two years ago – issuing larger and larger fines is still the Victorian government’s preferred approach to animal management;

Errant dog owners face harsher fines

Wandering dogs deemed an imminent threat to people could be destroyed on the spot under laws coming into effect today.

Pet owners who fail to register their dogs or cats face doubled fines of almost $2400.

New penalties include:
DOUBLING of potential fines for owners who fail to apply for or renew dog and/or cat registrations to $2389.
FINES up to $717 for dogs found wandering during the day.
FINES doubled to $4778 if a dog attacks someone.
The laws also broaden the criteria for declaring a dog menacing or dangerous.

The Herald Sun, 1st Sept 2010



Victorian groups The Lost Dogs Home and the RSPCA, both supported this move by government to strengthen laws against roaming dogs (commonly known as ‘lost dogs’). The Cat Protection Society has long called for stronger laws against ’semi-owners’, the group least likely to have their free-roaming cat registered.

Prepare for a bloodbath as people who’ve lost pets give up all hope of being able to afford their release. Prepare for the enormous increase in ‘unavoidable’ killing as dogs who’ve never caused a problem in their family or community are branded of ‘dangerous’ breed and are seized from their families. And don’t forget the thousands of cat carers now facing fines of over $2,000 if they continue to give their local stray a little bit of food.

We are witness. We should not forget who stood by and not only let this appalling action against animals and their owners happen, but encouraged it. Those groups claiming to be working to ‘protect’ pets.

Hugh Wirth Graeme Smith Carol Webb

Hugh Wirth RSPCA, Graeme Smith The Lost Dogs’ Home
& Carol Webb The Cat Protection Society

31
Aug

Solutions, not killing; cat management in New Zealand

Cat_trap

It takes a big change in mindset for an organisation to stop blaming the public and waiting in their shelter for animals to be brought in to be killed, and instead get out into their community and start working on solutions. But that’s exactly what the Wellington SPCA has chosen to do with the growing number of TNR programs they are supporting in their community.

They were recently interviewed by Wellington Access Radio about various aspects of their work, specifically an initiative which has been set up by Wellington SPCA, supported by Wellington City Council established to tackle a burgeoning stray cat population in a suburban area.

.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*.*

Wellington SPCA had a crisis on its hands recently, with an overwhelming number of cats needing homes. It got so bad that several weeks again they ran a free feline friday adoption day in an effort to have the cats rehomed. But the SPCA isn’t just dealing with cats needing homes with humans. In conjunction with the Wellington City Council and their local community, they’re also helping a colony of stray cats in the Strathmore area live out their lives as strays in a managed kind of way.

Interviewed
Animal Care and Adoptions Manager, Nicolas Taylor
Clinic Supervisor for the SPCA, Jo Double

The situation in Strathmore started a year ago, almost to the day. We got a phone call from pest control at Wellington City Council. They had been getting numerous calls from members of the public in Strathmore, who were basically sick of the cat problem as they saw it. And pest control decided to give us a call and see if we wanted to help them kill all these cats. And we said, well hangon, there’s a better way we can do it.

There were a few streets that people wanted targeted, some of the streets aren’t so bad, but definitely around some flats there was quite a large population of stray cats.

What is the difference between a stray and feral cat?

In terms of their behaviour, they’re quite similar, but a true feral cat has no contact with people. It’s living in the bush, it’s having nothing to do with people, it’s not eating rubbish, it’s not eating food that’s left out for it, it’s eating animal or birds or lizards or rodents. Whereas a stray cat can be feral-like in its behaviour, but they are generally living off the rubbish, or wherever they find the resources, around humans, often supermarkets, communal rubbish sites.

From overseas studies and situations overseas, and also in New Zealand, when you do go out and trap the cats, and basically kill them, it doesn’t actually change anything and you don’t actually eradicate the problem. New cats move in, where the other cats have left. We’re confident that in 10-15 years, the unwanted and stray cat population problem of Strathmore will be solved.

How’d you do it?

The whole Strathmore area, we’re estimating 15-20 cats per street. We’ve so far desexed 30 of the cats, there’s two streets we’ve really concentrated on and we’re going to start branching out. With one colony on one street there’s 18 cats, and in the neighbouring street there are 7 cats.

It took quite a while to get them (council) on board with the idea of not killing them and keeping them safe, but making sure they’re desexed and healthy and that people can look after them. So it’s a combined effort, they’re looking at such things as dealing with any of the rubbish situations out there, which areattracting the cats.

What we did initially, another staff member and I, got out there and door knocked 250 – 300 doors in two days. Just doorknocking and asking people “do you have an undesexed cat that you want us to desex?” because the first thing is to basically get all the owned cats desexed.

And then asking, “have you been feeding a stray cat?” and at first people think they’re in trouble and say no, but then they admit that they are feeding them and we would say “that’s great! Would you want to continue doing that?” and we’d trap these cats, desex and return them and they’d just need to make sure they’re healthy and fed every day. So they’re not a problem to other people in the street.

There are a lot of people who really cared about the cats, they were concerned about the problem and they didn’t like seeing all the kittens every year, litters of kittens getting sick. We didn’t find many people who were negative about it, they just wanted to make sure something was being done.

Trapping the cats

Next we got the (commmunity cat) managers to get into a feeding regime, feeding the cats at the same time each day, basically training the cats to come to the same place each day at the same time. Then we put out flyers to the community saying ‘please keep your cat inside overnight, we’re going to start trapping the next day’. So basically, if you’ve got an owned cat, we don’t want to be trapping your cat.

We told the colony managers ‘don’t feed the cats today’ and so they’re going to be hungry. And then when it comes to the normal feeding time, we put the traps out and we were catching the cats and moving them and we got 18 cats in a really short amount of time. They were in humane traps so the animals were unharmed and they were sedated in the traps.

All these cats, we did a body condition score, all of them because they’ve been fed for a month, they were actually slightly overweight. So they were in brilliant condition, really healthy. We desexed, vaccinated wormed and fleaed them. We also ear tipped the left ear, which is an international symbol of a TNR cat: a monitored cat in a colony. And that makes it easier too, because when you’ve got cats in a colony you can tell, all these ones have been desexed and if you see another cat in there that has two pointy ears, you know there’s a cat in there that needs to be trapped and desexed.

When we opened up the traps and the cats went flying out, the crazy thing was we just thought they’d run and hide, but they turned around and were watching us. They were becoming more human friendly from interacting with the colony manager.

On environmental impact

Catching birds is a high energy, often unsuccessful enterprise for a cat. Its much easier for them to catch rodents. Cats which are fed every day are less likely to be catching wildlife. The thing is, there are always going to be cats. Trapping cats and killing them doesn’t solve the problem, more cats move in and they won’t be desexed, so they will just produce more and more kittens and the population explodes. If you desex them, that reduced the numbers; these cats keep out other cats from coming into the territory, they’re quite territorial so what you’re doing is reducing the number of cats in that area, which is only going to be a good thing for the wildlife.

We’re hoping to see a reduction in the number of unwanted kittens coming in from Strathmore as of November. Basically, there won’t be any coming from Strathmore.

Listen to the full interview here (mp3)

29
Jun

If you’re going to tell people…

… that cats should be indoors, that cats should be registered and desexed by law and that free-roaming cats need to be trapped for their own good; then you can’t say ‘it’s not our job’ when they ask you for help.

Sarah_King

Sad abandoned cats cause concerns at Quakers Hill

(Cat pic) It’s hard to imagine that a face like this lives off discarded food scavenged from rubbish bins. Sadly, this is the reality for dozens of stray cats who have sought refuge around the Parkway Rd McDonald’s and the Caltex Service Station at Quakers Hill.

Resident Sarah King says Blacktown City Council and the RSPCA seemed disinclined to help so she has launched a petition urging the council to take action against the growing feral cat population.

Ms King and a group of friends plan to trap as many cats as they can and petition the council to find them new homes or destroy the animals humanely.

She said businesses, the council and the RSPCA were caught up in a game of “finger pointing”.

“The response has been pretty appalling, but something needs to be done,” Ms King said. “These cats are starving, carrying disease and living a … horrible life. They keep breeding and it’s getting worse.”

Driving through the area the Advocate saw cats in bins, kittens hiding in the hedges – even remains on the side of Parkway Rd and a carcass in a garden bed.

McDonald’s hired a private firm to remove kittens and adults but numbers are again getting out of hand and they don’t believe it’s their sole responsibility.

[...]
Two RSPCA spokeswomen told the Advocate the cats were not their responsibility and “economic pressure” prevented them taking further action.

Ms King has now lodged a formal complaint with Blacktown City Council who declined the opportunity to comment when contacted by the Advocate.

 

Chris_Lyall

Fur flies over inaction on cats

Animal lover Chris Lyall says a cat and her four kittens could be buried alive if the bulldozing of four derelict houses on Woodland St, Balgowlah, continues.

The Manly resident said the family of strays has taken refuge under one of the houses with all efforts to rescue them so far unsuccessful.

[...]
Hoping for action to delay the demolition, Mr Lyall contacted Manly Council but claims they are yet to act.

Manly Council general manager Henry Wong said the council was aware of the situation but it was the RSPCA or other animal welfare organisations that were the appropriate bodies to assist with the matter.

The cats’ plight, however, has created confusion, with the RSPCA indicating that the welfare of the mother and her kittens was the council’s responsibility under the Companion Animals Act.

Mr Lyall said the lack of help was frustrating.

[...]
Ellen McGinness, from the Cat Protection Society, said it appeared the issue was being palmed off.

“It should be the council’s responsibility – the RSPCA only deal with owned cats. There is a huge problem with councils not taking responsibility.”

24
Jun

Empowered Queensland cat trappers targeting pets

Cat_Trap
Cat in a cage trap, QLD: Lonely Planet images

Is anyone else seeing a trend? From Queensland last year;

The Animal Management (Cats and Dogs) Act 2008 was passed on December 11 2008 and is designed to encourage responsible pet ownership by introducing compulsory registration and identification. The Act took effect throughout south-east Queensland councils on July 1 2009, with the rest of the state scheduled to come in line within two years.


And now today;

Leanne Christie fears her neighbourhood has become a street of missing moggies, after three of her much-loved cats disappeared.

The animal lover said the most recent loss was last week, when her seven-month-old kitten Cougar vanished one afternoon — but her neighbours have also complained of disappearing pets.

“I’ve had three cats disappear in a year and my neighbours say they’ve lost two cats this year,” she said. “Another lady down the street lost her cat and there’s always posters up for missing cats.”

She said she knew of about eight cats that had vanished in recent months.

Due to the large number of missing animals, Miss Christie believes they are being deliberately caught and taken away.


RSPCA Bundaberg shelter manager Vicki Beer said it was not unusual for free-roaming cats to disappear.

“Any neighbour could have a cat trap in their yard and it’s quite within their rights to trap your animal if it comes on their property,” Ms Beer said. “They should bring (trapped cats) to the RSPCA or tell the council, but that doesn’t always happen.”



See that’s bad. We should be against that. It’s not reducing shelter intakes (and killing) if people are trapping owned (and unowned!) cats and taking them to the shelter. We should be working on things that keep cats out of shelters.

Like this:”Cove officials, residents learn how to control city’s feral cat population”;

Mike Fry stressed that a lethal method to controlling cat colonies is an expensive and never-ending battle.

“Once the carrying capacity for the population is reached, for each adult that is removed, there are plenty of kittens to take its place,” he said.

The most successful method is the “TNR” process by which animals are trapped, neutered or spayed and released back into the colony. Fry said the goal is to sterilize at least 70 percent of the population — that is the key number to stop the growth of the colony.

“It’s the only solution right now that works,” he said. “And if done correctly, it can be an incredible success.”



We’re ignoring experiences like this, in preference of;

new law -> trapping increases -> blame society, come up with newer law -> empower trappers even further -> trapping increases

Being played out time and time again. I wonder how many examples we’ll need, how many thousands of cats will need to die, before we finally acknowledge that blaming the public and dreaming up new laws is not working?

23
Jun

The City of Swan – a case study in cat management

Cat_grass
image mosippy’s photostream


Question: How do laws that make free-roaming, unowned cats a target for impoundment, reduce shelter killing?

Answer: They don’t

City’s war on cats

More than 270 cats found roaming within the City of Swan have been put down since new City bylaws were enacted.

Statistics obtained by the Community Newspaper Group confirm 273 cats have been euthanased since the City began impounding straying animals in January 2009.

Chief executive Mike Foley said under the City’s law residents are allowed to trap cats that enter their property uninvited.


Mr Foley said that from January to April this year, 82 cats had been taken in, with 46 being killed.

“Community acceptance of the City’s local law related to cats has been positive and the introduction of State legislation should add value to these existing local laws,” he said.


In 1993 the City of Perth subsidised a cat sterilisation scheme which enabled 591 cats to be sterilised at a cost to the City of around $11,500.00 (around $20 per cat).

In January 2009 the Swan council started their ‘trap and remove’ service. Residents could trap cats, the council could trap cats and they implemented a $100 fine to cat owners whose pets were impounded. Between the months of March and November 2009, council impounded 222 cats of which 183 were killed, (20 were rehomed and 19 were re-claimed). Similarily, this year the pound is also averaging 20 cats per month impounded.

The current City of Swan ’round-up and kill cats’ enforcement model has a budget of $60,000 per year.

Thats $243 PER CAT, of taxpayers money being spent on a program that is increasing intakes. Even if desexing has gone up to $50 per cat with inflation – capturing to kill is still nearly five times as expensive as a desexing program, increases killing in pounds and does little to help owners access cheap and free cat desexing.

But it doesn’t end there; cat groups are now rejecting this program stating;

(the new) proposed legislation – which would make sterilisation, micro chipping and registration compulsory – was a much better alternative than the local laws.


Ignoring that compulsory microchipping, registration and desexing is exactly the same model, but with a different name.

- It’s still based on enforcement, rather than community desexing services
- It still needs councils to invest in impounding cats that fall foul of the law
- It still is a ‘catch and destroy’ pass to animal management and cat hating community members for free-roaming, unowned animals, as a cat without an owner, isn’t going to be registered or desexed.

Except now it’s on a much grander scale, with the new proposed cat legislation mandating that every single council follow in the footsteps of Swan, invest thousands in enforcement and expanding trapping programs across the state.

No increase in the number of cats being desexed. More healthy cats being killed. Huge costs all round.

Question: How do laws that make free-roaming, unowned cats a target for impoundment, reduce shelter killing?

Answer: They don’t

14
Jun

Cats – an easy target for lazy environmentalists


Since hubby and I are having a ‘dry’ June and going to the pub for lunch was out, we spent Saturday walking through the city. Along with bags of junk (the sales are on) and some retro fabric, a secondhand copy of Tim Low’s 2001 book ‘Feral Future’ jumped off the shelf and into my possession.

Now, I wanted to learn more about feral animals but I fully expected Feral Future to be frustrating anti-cat reading. But au contraire! It’s an absolute cracker, taking what could be a pretty dry topic and turning it into ‘the astounding history of Australia’ worthy of any Ripley’s Believe it or Not.

The book starts with a seriously interesting premise;

World ecology is now locked onto the same trajectory as popular culture. Just as American pop music and blue jeans, burgers and Coke have displaced indigenous cultures and foods in every land, so too are vigorous exotic invaders overwhelming native species and natural habitats. Some biologists warn of a ‘McDonaldization’ of work ecology. The earth is hurtling towards a one world culture and (maybe) a one world ecosystem.


But what’s most fascinating in our ‘native loving’ society is that, for the most part, rather than these organisims ’sneaking in’, we’ve have been and continue to be complicit in bringing the non-native plants and animals to Australia.

The long list of ferals – they’re not what you think!

Rabbits are decended from domestic livestock gone wild and are just one of thosuands of purposely introduced ‘ferals’. Chickens, pigs, cabbages, wheat, apples, lemons, camels, rye, coffee, sheep, goats, radishes, perch, turnips, onions, salmon, red deer, carp peas, beans, strawberries, horses, coconut, trout, sisal, tea, figs, chillies, blackberries, cattle, ‘double gee’, olives, fennel, liquorice, grapes, buffalo, mango, donkey, banana, oats, pistacho, bream, and cashew were all brought in to feed people. Most of these have escaped and invaded forests and woodlands, replacing native species and forever changing the makeup of our natural environment.

Then there where the ’stowaways’ – diseases and parasites brought on plants and animals; blight, fleas, mites, snails, weed burrs, spiders, algae, kelp, grasshoppers, slaters, fungus, weevils, cockroaches, beetles, moths, flies, mosquitos, wasps, bees, worms and rats and mice.

The ones we introduced either because we were homesick, or to help farmers; sparrows, Indian mynas, buffel grass, prickly pear, boxthorn, cotton, mosquito fish, cane toads, pasture grasses and foxes.

And those we brought because we liked having beautiful gardens; thistles, hemlock, Paterson’s curse, water hyacinth, lantana, privet, camphor laurel, lavender, holly, cats claw, rubber vine, lawn grass and St John’s Wort.

Or to keep as pets; guppies, mystery snails, goldfish, cichlids, platies, swordtails, finches and dozens of water plants. Again, all have ‘gone feral’ and are now living wild.

Along with these examples is a chapter on how, having not learned anything from our history of unsuccessful introductions, we still bring in new pasture plants, garden plants and internationally bred pets into Australia every day.

So where do cats fit?

So, half way through the book and there’s been barely a peep about ‘feral cats’. But rest assured, they get their own chapter and here’s where it gets really interesting, because the chapter is entitled; Cats – Scoundrels or Scapegoats?

Suburban cats, because they dispatch lots of birds, are often condemned as major killers, second only to their feral kin in the bush. But the evidence is not convincing. Cats kill millions of birds in gardens, true enough, but ecologically there is nothing wrong with this – predation is a fact of life. Birds are killed in forests, too, by falcons, owls, quolls, dingoes, snakes, goannas, even spiders. Pet pussies are simply the urban equivalent of these killers. Hunting by pet cats only becomes a worry if the death rate exceeds their birthrate. By and large, this doesn’t seem to be the case. The birds caught by cats are usually abundant species that thrive on development. Some of them – including willie wagtails, crested pigeons, and magpie larks – are probably faring better today than ever before.

This is certainly true of the common garden lizards that cats like to kill. Some studies show that leafy suburbs actually support more birds than intact forests, despite all the cats, because gardens planted with berries and nectar- rich flowers produce more food.

If any species is threatening bird in suburbia it is probably the pied currawong, a vicious native bird that raids nests and devours chicks and eggs. Native noisy miners also make mischief by driving away smaller birds.



But what about true free-roaming cats?

Feral cats in the bush however, can be a serious problem, though probably not to birds, which they seldom eat. Studies of their diet have revealed what cartoonists have always known; cats prefer rats, mice and other mammals. Rabbits are often their staple diet; cats may be helping the ecology by keeping bunny numbers down.


Rabbits may have helped wipe our small outback wallabies and bandicoots by taking their food and grazing down their cover. They are possibly the worst of all our pests because of the extrodinary numbers they can achieve.


Black rats are rarely portrayed as killers, but as destroyers of island life they may rank higher than cats. On Lord Howe island they knocked off five bird species, and on Christmas Island they helped exterminate Maclear’s rat, a unique native rodent. They reached the island in 1899 by hiding in hay, and ten years later no Maclear’s rats remained. Trout, too have driven several species close to extinction, an achievement that cats, on hard evidence, cannot match.



Do cats deserve all the attention?

Many conservationists treat cats as if they were our number one pest, but I believe foxes, rabbits, pigs, toads, trout and some weeds all pose a greater menace. Goats, donkeys, carp, mosquito fish, Pacific sea stars, green crabs, honeybees, bumblebees, and Amazonian earth worms concern me a great deal too. And worse than any of these is probably phytophthora, the dreaded fungal disease, along with the chytrid fungus killing our frogs. By saying this I don’t wish to exonerate cats, simply to broaden the debate.

Instead of heedlessly angering cat owners by vilifying their pets, we might look around us at all the other pests receiving less attention.



(highlighting mine)

No matter how many times the media shows an angry cat photo in defence of the latest cat cull (have you noticed the parallel to the media’s representation of pit bulls?), they are just one, amongst many animals and plants that are changing our landscape.

Cattle and sheep have probably contributed more to extinctions than foxes or rats.

As one university biologist complained to me, those people who rant about the cat should add ‘tle’ to the name and pursue a worthier rogue.


But we’re unlikely to see an anti-farming movement in Australia, nor an anti-aquarium pets, nor an anti-’flowers in the garden movement’; so it seems unfair to single out cats when we’ve no interest in solving any of the other issues that would halt the ‘Mcdonaldization’ Low speaks of in his book.

Arrogant acts

It is also not as simple as we would like, to just ‘turn back the clock’ and eliminate ferals and weeds.

In the feral future, natives and exotics will become more and more interdependent.



Low goes on to describe how non-natives and natives are now engaged in complex life-sustaining relationships. Marram grasslands feed wombats, camphor laurel forests sustain vast flocks of fruit pigeons and long-billed and western corellas live supported by farmland. The rare southern brown bandicoots use blackberry brambles as protection against foxes and the nearly extinct Norfolk Island Parrot lives almost entirely upon olives and cherry guava. Rabbits, black rats and mice now sustain a large proportion of birds of prey and in some places young rabbits make up 60 to 90% of the diet of local eagles, harriers, kites and falcons. House mice make up as much as 97% of the diet of barn owls, while in the cities, the endangered peregine falcons are growing plump on street pigeons.

In short, just like all the other animals and plants in Australia, a new balance has been created with each participant bringing positives and negatives to the evolving ecology. To arbitrarily decide that one established organism is not worthy of their position, is just as arrogant human mistake, as the one the first settlers made when they introduced new animals and plants to Australia.

With what we know about cats in Australia and modern management techniques, the idea that we’re still championing the catch and kill techniques that we have been using since the 70’s is inexcusable.

The case for humane cat management

The modern cat care approach should be thus – keeping pet cats inside either part or all of the time, is a seriously good idea and should be encouraged for both cat welfare and environmental reasons. But this constant drive by the media, cat welfare groups and cat haters to have them exterminated from the suburbs is both undeserved and cruel.

Programs which help those cats already living in the environment, keep others from winding up abandoned and support owners to make responsible pet care decisions are the key to effective cat management in Australia.

Feral_Future

11
Jun

Why we can’t just ‘get rid of’ free-roaming cats

Sometimes comments are so interesting, they deserve a blog of their own.

Jax says: I’m not sure feral cats living in supported colonies is humane. They are usually susceptible to disease, can starve, suffer injuries from other animals and are generally in worse health than owned cats. Not to mention the horrific effect cats have on wildlife. I grew up in the country & saw awful examples as a kid of feral cats just surviving with closed up eyes, bad flu. And I used to feed them! Sometimes it’s kinder to humanely put them to sleep as from what I saw their quality of life is poor.



Here’s the thing that Australians don’t seem to be able to get their head around… we don’t get to choose whether cats live free-roaming and unowned, any more than we get to choose the population surge of kangaroos on golf-courses, the boom-bust cycle of rainbow lorikeets at fruit harvesting time or snakes living near silos and farms because that’s where the rodents are. We have changed our environment in a way that works for some animals, has been disastrous for others.

Cats live where cats can live. If the school oval is covered with enough sandwich crusts to feed the mice that would support seven cats – you can bet there’ll be seven cats living behind the school canteen.

We can ‘choose’ to trap and kill those cats; and then when more cat move in, trap another seven soon after, and another seven soon after that… we can ‘choose’ to do that verbatim.

Or we can choose to desex those seven cats, put someone from the school in charge of them and try and make their lives a little easier. We can even get the carer to work on cleaning up the site, so it’s less attractive to mice. But this is a holistic solution about undoing the damage we humans have caused – not a choice that ‘we just don’t want the cats’.

While animal welfare groups like to blame ‘irresponsible owners’, that flies in the face of every study on cat population dynamics that’s ever been done – the overwhelming majority of cats entering shelters have never had owners. Blaming cat owners of WA (of which 88% have desexed animals), for the millions running wild across the state is like blaming rabbit owners for Australia’s population of wild rabbits. The two aren’t even close to being effected by each other anymore.

The government’s feral pest advisory group – the one who is given millions to dream up new toxins and trapping techniques, they say eradication in Australia is unrealistic. We have to move beyond thinking that cats live wild because the government hasn’t brought in a law, or because people are irresponsible, or because we just haven’t trapped enough yet. The science says we will always have cats living in self-sustaining wild populations in Australia. Now we know that – what else can we do?

Cats living wild are exposed to exactly the same life-hazards as any other wild animal. We wouldn’t suggest all possums should be locked in zoos for their own protection, so its illogical to think cats need to be. Certainly, they get sick and die sometimes. But of a study of 26,000 cats entering shelters in Victoria (one of our colder, harsher climates) 78% were stray admissions (unowned cats) and 73% received an optimum body score (healthy weight score). These guys weren’t doing it tough; they had an advantage that other wild animals didn’t – the ability to live in close proximity to humans and therefore receive food and care.

The biggest killer of cats isn’t ‘living wild’ – it’s being impounded and killed in an animal shelter.

street-cat


09
Jun

Why WA’s new cats laws will mean death for millions of animals

Cat groups in Western Australia are celebrating, as the pledge for statewide cat laws was today unveiled by the government;

Cat Haven operations manager Roz Robinson said she hoped to see laws soon to stop thousands of cats and kittens being euthanised, better identify lost animals and reduce problems caused by unsterilised cats. (ref)


Local Government Minister John Castrilli said proposed State Government legislation should reduce the high proportion of stray cats in WA.

More than 5000 cats are put down by the Cat Haven each year.

Under the proposal, local governments would be required to administer and enforce compulsory cat identification through micro-chipping, as well as compulsory registration and sterilisation of cats.

It is estimated about 200,000 WA homes have cats, with millions more cats roaming feral. (ref)


Cat_Trap



I’ve written about mandatory desexing many times before, but given I’m from WA I’m going to go over it for my local peeps.

Why won’t these new cat laws reduce shelter killing?

All of the initiatives (desexing, microchipping and registration) “local governments would be required to administer and enforce” are about to be turned against the “millions of cats” without owners. This won’t result in less killing, but much, much more as councils are empowered to trap every unowned cat falling foul of the new laws.

According to the Consultation Paper this new legislation, “allows for cats found in a public place or on private property to be seized and then rehomed or disposed of”. With free-roaming cats usually not suitable to live as housepets, this is a formula to expand shelter killing from a few thousand each year, into tens of thousands..

But will removing cats, lead to the elimination of street cats? According to the most current science on the topic of feral cats; the ‘Review of cat ecology and management strategies in Australia’ eradication in places that aren’t islands, or bounded by cat proof fencing is unrealistic. That is, cats can and do reproduce and reenter a non-isolated area at a rate that exceeds even the most enthusiastic trapping program.

Sending our councils out, mandating they enforce cat laws and begin trapping unowned cats, with no likely end to the trapping, it’s delusive to think this could ever result in less cats killed in pounds.

But surely, it will increase the rates of desexing?!

From the Consultation Paper;

It is acknowledged that the effectiveness of mandatory sterilisation in reducing the numbers of unwanted cats is not conclusive. Studies indicate that there are already high levels of sterilisation of owned cats at around 90%. Research undertaken for the WA Cats Advisory Committee indicated that 88% of domestic cats were sterilised.


Research also indicates that the high levels of sterilisation in owned cats exceeds the rate calculated for zero population growth, which is consistent with a national survey which found a steady decline in the number of owned cats.



The majority of owned cats are desexed in WA. Those that aren’t desexed are living in some of the poorest suburbs of perth, meaning that support services are required not new laws and fines.

Compulsory desexing laws expend resources rounding up and killing animals. Those same resources can and should be spent desexing animals for people who many not be able to do so themselves. The cost of seizing, holding, killing and disposing of a cat because their owner has not desexed it could cover the cost of sterilising the pet, plus others.

If this were really about bringing down shelter kill rates we have to help, not blame

Other countries that are bringing their shelter kill rates down, have done so not with mandatory desexing (there is no example in the world which has shown mandatory desexing to have brought down shelter kill rates, in fact major animal welfare groups in the US no longer support it).

But there are things that have been shown to bring down shelter kill rates and stabilise free-roaming cat populations.

If this were really about reducing killing;

- Animal rescue groups would lobby government to support the development of a community vet program. Councils would offer any person on a pension free cat desexing vouchers, along with a program for semi-cat owners and colony carers.

- Rather than invest in expanding each councils pound facilities to be able to process cats, cat welfare groups would be lobbying for protection to all free-roaming cats. If a cat is found to be feral and unsuitable for rehoming, then it should be desexed and returned to where it was collected. ‘Barn cat’ adoptions can help people adopt outside cats.

- Education campaigns should move away from ‘Who’s for Cats’ style promoting impoundment and towards promoting awareness of semi-owned cats, support for community cat carers and awareness of council desexing resources.

Reducing shelter killing is about reducing intakes

To reduce the number of animals killed in our shelters, we must minimise the numbers we take in. We don’t do this by creating mandatory desexing laws that invent more reasons for cats to be impounded, or for them to be seized from owners who can’t afford to desex, or from those who care for community cats. Mandatory desexing only increases impoundments, and therefore shelter killing.

Programs which reduce shelter killing, help the community with affordable, accessible pet desexing. These programs are cheaper than a law because law enforcement is really, really expensive. They’re more effective than a law because everyone is willingly involved, rather than being accused, persecuted or having their pet removed. They’re better for cats, because despite what many would have you believe, a healthy cat, is NOT better off dead than semi-owned and cared for by the community.

Reactionary laws, which treat the public as a enemy that needs to be coerced and punished simply build barriers between animal groups and the very community we need to help us manage and care for our community cats.

08
Jun

The Lost Dogs Home newest silver bullet

The Lost Dogs Home is again calling for a ‘pet owner licencing scheme’ on the back of their efforts to develop a short pre-adoption quiz for people adopting from their shelter (I know, screening potential adopters before adoption – it’s ‘revolutionary’).

“Pet Licences issued by The Lost Dogs’ Home should be made mandatory across Australia”.
Lost Dogs Home website


But should they really? Lets look at the ‘reasons pets end up in shelters’;

Adoption returns
We can reasonably assume that there isn’t a huge problem with people returning adopted animals to the Lost Dogs Home. If there is, then certainly there is something wrong with the way they’re matching pet to owner and the follow up support they’ve been offering; because this isn’t common amongst rescues. So that could be fixed by the pound doing a better job.

Lost pets
Most intakes of any pound with a Council contract are the result of pets getting loose. This is why pounds exist and that’s ok. Having photos of each animal up on the internet helps owners be reunited with their animals, so the Lost Dogs’s Home could do a better job by taking photo of each pet on intake and getting it up on the web.

Fines, which deter people from collecting their pets, could be waived to people whose pets have never been impounded before – that again is the pound understanding its public and doing a better job.

Surrenders
The smallest intakes of a pound, despite popular opinion, are owner surrenders.

A percentage of people have a genuine or unforseen reason for giving up their pet; moving house, getting sick, pets not getting along, change of family circumstance, loss of job.

A percentage are less-than-genuine (however still valid because if someone doesn’t want their pet, it’s important to get that pet into a new home); including no longer ‘wanting’ the pet, unrealistic expectations of pet ownership, un-treated behavioural problems and unwanted litters.

And some people have genuine reasons relating to that particular pet (unmanageable aggression, hyperactivity, personality clashes between pet and owner, or pets who don’t cope with a change of circumstance, like moving to a smaller property).

It’s complicated

They’re proposing that of the 6 million owned cats and dogs of Australia, of which only a couple of hundred thousand use shelters each year, where most are claimed – and with the myriad of unforseen, genuine reasons for surrender, with only a tiny percentage of pets entering shelters because their owners are fickle…

…. the easiest way to stop shelters killing these animals is to quiz every single pet owning family before they get a pet.

Sorry, what?

The easiest way for the Management of the Lost Dogs Home to effect the number of pets killed in their shelters – is to stop killing pets in their shelters.

- Not killing young, or sick pets who could be saved by foster care.

- Not killing pets with easily treatable training issues, offering a behavioural rehabilitation program with professional support and the use of trained volunteers.

- Not killing friendly ‘pit bull type’ dogs, and no longer lobbying for more expansive powers to kill them.

- Not killing free-roaming cats, but instead working on programs that allow them to live with support.

- Not killing stray pets, by helping owners with an online searchable ‘lost pet’ tool with a commitment that every. single. pet. will have its photo taken and put on the internet.

- Not killing older pets with manageable health issues, and instead offering support services to seniors via a ‘free seniors for seniors’ adoption and vet care program.

- Not killing pets by promoting adoptions, ensuring each available pet gets a photo on the web and an attractive profile outlining their best traits.

- Not killing pets who don’t get adopted or who need extra care, by opening the doors to community rescue groups to take the pets, treat them and find them homes.

- Not supporting draconian and unhelpful owner targeting initiatives like the Frankston ‘desex before release’ pound program, mandatory pet desexing or ‘Who’s for Cats’… all of which have seen impoundments and killing surge.

The idea of a national pet owner licencing scheme is nothing but Australia’s most ineffective shelter – the one who kills a larger percentage of their intakes than any other – expanding their failed programs beyond Victoria (the home of some of the worst pet laws in Australia). We must reject the idea, not just because it passes the buck for shelter killing back to ‘bad owners’ – a theory which has since been exploded as simply an excuse for poor shelter performance – but because those who are driving it, have no experience at all in leading a successful, life-saving community.

Let’s not follow any more ‘great’ initiatives from Victoria until they are able to get even one of their communities away from the bulk-killing of shelter animals. Forget the rest of Australia, so far they only work the leaders of animal sheltering in Victoria need to do, is to drag themselves out of the high-kill mentality.


Graeme_Smith_Lost_Dogs_Home
Graeme Smith – CEO – Lost Dogs’ Home

04
Jun

Propaganda and cat welfare

The big news in WA animal welfare, is the ongoing saga of the ‘Stirling cat ladies’:

City of Stirling Mayor David Boothman said the City first became aware that there was an issue with the property on Sixth Avenue in May 1987 when it received a complaint from a neighbour.

“In the 23 years since the first complaint, the City has made hundreds of visits to the property, issued dozens of formal notices on multiple issues including removal of rubbish, reduction in number of cats on the property, repair of property, maintenance of water supply, electrical and gas services and removal of undergrowth in addition to conducting multiple ratepayer funded cleanups of the site,” he said.


The council and Cat Haven have entered the property to seize the cats and try and force the sale of the property, after support efforts by social services were rejected and complaints from neighbours became too loud to ignore.

Stirling

Now, there is no denying these ladies need help. Ursula Dueschen is in her 80’s living with her elderly daughter Tatyana in a caravan without sewers, plumbing or electricity. The decision to finally force them into accepting assistance, is nothing but a good thing for both the community and the cats themselves. But here’s where it gets misleading;

Cat Haven spokeswoman Jessica Reid said said the situation highlighted what can happen when cats are neglected and unsterilised.

“Apart from the health issues for the cats themselves when they breed out of control, cat colonies causes massive issues to the environment as well as problems within communities,” she said.

“Unsterilised cats having an increased tendency to start cat fights and mark their territories on neighbouring properties, so you can imagine what a colony of 30 cats that can have three litters of kittens a year each could do.

“It really highlights the need for compulsory state sterilisation laws which we hope to see going through parliament very soon.”


Not only did the major ‘cat advocacy’ group in the state just tell people that “cat colonies causes massive issues to the environment”, then rounded up the cats and killed them – but proposed that a situation that had run on for 23 years, that a myriad of social support services, police, council and ongoing legal action couldn’t resolve… could have be fixed with a law that requires ‘cats get desexed’.

Sorry, no deal.

We need to stop listening to groups who will use an unfortunate situation with a couple of ladies who clearly have medical and personal issues, as a platform to run down the animals they claim to be working to protect.

We need to stop listening to groups who will use the ‘car crash’ media surrounding this most pitiful situation (check out the ‘photo gallery’ CATS, RATS AND RUBBISH) to promote an insultingly oversimplified solution – mandatory desexing – to the complex issue of cat management. One that make no logical sense, has caused more problems than it’s solved in every place it’s been tried and that is rapidly losing support within the industry.

Instead, we need to become involved and offer intelligent solutions to the cat issues of WA. It is being debated now. Contact the Cat Haven and demand to be included.