Archive for May, 2010

31
May

The scoop #4

Rescue news from around Australia…

Dogs

Ipswich (QLD) – Confirming that dog attacks often happen in the home, a blue heeler has bitten the nine-year-old girl on the lip. Thankfully, although police were called, the girl’s injuries weren’t life threatening.

Health and Regulation Committee chairman Councillor Andrew Antoniolli said the incident highlighted the importance of parents to supervise their children around dogs.“A good percentage of the dog attacks that we’ve been seeing lately are attacks that are occurring within the dog property,” Cr Antoniolli said.

“It just indicates that at all times you must ensure that you’re vigilant with children and dogs.”



Congratulations to Cr Andrew for his considered response to this attack. All dogs can bite.

Also in Ipswich, the beginning of the fallout from the recent Supreme Court decision that dogs registered as Amstaff’s are actually ‘pitbulls’;

The city’s health and regulation committee chairman Andrew Antoniolli said the redefinition of the American Staffordshire was the result of a drawn-out court case on the Gold Coast.

“We are concerned that we have at least 126 of the 30,000 dogs registered in Ipswich which were identified on their registration as American Staffordshire terriers,” Mr Antoniolli said.



.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Mornington Peninsula (VIC) rangers have killed a dog, that had been impounded while its owners built a dangerous dog enclosure;

Syphon

Ms Clements and Mr Bartling had erected a locked 2m-high cage in their backyard, but had not finished the required roofing and guttering when their pet was impounded.

Four days later they received the devastating phone call.

“They said they had put the wrong dog down,” Ms Clements said.

“They said he was in the fridge and when did we want him dropped down?”

Mr Bartling described Syphon as his best mate and said there was no excuse for the mistake because his pet was microchipped.



.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Manningham (VIC) will be getting its first dedicated dog-friendly park from July.

The dedicated dog zone will be fenced off to give pets a safe place to run free off-lead and to socialise with other dogs. The park will also feature drinking water taps for dogs, and extra seating for pet owners.



Cool! Single use, fenced and patrolled parks are vital to the health of the dogs in any community, especially as people’s backyards shrink. Patrols are also vital; not only to ensure that people using the park are doing so in a responsible manner, but as a chance for council animal management to have positive interactions with the pet owning community.

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

While the RSPCA ACT have again, showed us the way with this post on their Facebook and Twitter;

Picture13


The video of the dogs is here:


.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Cats

Mitcham Council (SA, not VIC) is encouraging residents dob in neighbours who own more than two cats or who fail to microchip and register them, as part of the enforcement model for their new cat bylaws. Thankfully, some councillors are not convinced;

Cr Grant Hudson told the meeting it was the council’s role to intervene in cat problems, not a neighbour’s job.

“These days a lot of neighbours don’t even know each other and making complaints about pets is one way to create neighbourhood friction where none existed before,” he told the Eastern Courier Messenger after the meeting.



If the bylaw is passed, which will force cat owners to register and microchip their pets from August 1st, the only way to actually enforce the model would be some kind of ‘neighbourhood spy’ campaign. Cats don’t carry their licences in their wallets and those people with ‘too many’ are going to go to ground. So with neighbours dobbing on neighbours and everyone now complaining about that free-roaming cat that no one owns, Mitcham Council animal control is going to be busy! busy! busy! trapping and impounding cats.

The bylaw is set to cost $252,000 for five years. The RSPCA supported the introduction of the bylaw and have accepted a ‘generous grant’ from Mitcham Council to buy cat traps to hire to the public.

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

An update on the disastrous removal of feral cats from Macquarie Island.

A team of experts are bound for a remote island equipped with helicopters guns and dogs to eradicate rabbits, black rats and house mice.

The imported species have wreaked environmental havoc on Macquarie Island, a tiny piece of Australian territory halfway between New Zealand and Antartica.

The World Heritage listed island serves as the mating and nesting place of countless penguins, seabirds and seals who are under threat from the pests.



This exercise has been required after parks and wildlife management, removed all the feral cats from the island to save the native seabirds. Unfortunately, the decision allowed the rabbit population to explode and, in turn, destroy much of its fragile vegetation that birds depend on for cover. The resulting “environmental devastation” was estimated to cost $24 million Australian dollars to remedy. Whoopsies.

See another post: ‘Introduced’ doesn’t mean not important

.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

Shelter news

Wanneroo (WA) has problems with its pound;

Councillor Rudi Steffens said the current facilities were “old and aged”.

“There is still no exercise area for the animals, the kennels are constantly wet through the day and animals are susceptible to cutting their feet on the cages,” he said.

“I don’t believe this facility is standard, I believe it is substandard.”

Councillor Alan Blencowe agreed.

“Six dogs die every day in the City of Wanneroo, that is 2000 dogs per year and we only have one crematorium in the northern suburbs,” he said.

“As a council, we need to be a little bit more responsible than to have these animals’ bodies just being put into landfill.”


You could try not killing them – just a thought.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.

And Australia gets its own rescue pet stamps out on the 29th June;

Stamps

Stamps-2

This stamp issue promotes responsible dog ownership and supports the dedicated work of organisations re-homing lost and abandoned dogs.

Their number is significantly boosted by the many other small shelters also re-homing dogs.


Congratulations to NSW Animal Rescue for punching above their weight, being included alongside the RSPCA and Lost Dogs Home.

29
May

Improving shelter cat adoptions

Cat_Toy

The April/June edition of the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science ‘Factors Relevant to Adoption of Cats in an Animal Shelter‘ researched the effects of toys, cage location, and cat characteristics (activity level, age, sex and coat colour) on the adoptions of 111 cats available in an animal shelter.

Results showed that “active cats were more likely to be adopted during the 16-week study than cats that were less active”. This adopter preference has serious implications for shelters with an environment which sees cats sleep for most of the day. It is probably also one of several contributing factors for higher rates of adoption of the more active kittens and adolescents.

The study suggested that shelters should investigate cage enrichment and conditions that provoke interest in the cats as a way to foster an environment that promotes adoption. Allowing adopters to interact with the cats through open plan cat rooms, allocating volunteers time to encourage daytime activity in the animals and interactive cat toys may all be ways to bring about a connection with cat and potential adopter.

The study also found that animals with toys in their cages were viewed more times than those without, regardless of whether the toys were actually played with by the cat. Cats housing at eye level, were viewed more than those on lower tiers, and the more a cat was viewed, the more likely that it would result in an adoption.


May

9 out of 10 cats impounded at Logan, not desexed

Another pound using the media to get the word out about their available pets;

Picture 15

Picture 16

While I’m not a fan of the associated article that details how awfully irresponsible their community is, at least these guys are trying to get the word out about the pets they have in their pound. Maybe, just like in the instance of Fraser Coast, the ‘irresponsible public’ will be the ones to answer the call and save the lives of these pets.

Combined with their new outreach desexing program for the pets of the disadvantaged, low income earners and pensioners, Logan seems determined to turn the situation around for their homeless animals.

An interesting statistic from the report was that 9 out of 10 cats are entering the Logan shelter are unidentified and undesexed (unowned). Unless a program of non-lethal ‘community cat’ management is introduced, it will be impossible to bring the kill rate of 600 cats in three months down. Fractious cats who’ve never lived in a home have no adoption prospects once in care – we must protect them from entering the shelter in the first place.

Logan needs their community’s support. If you live in the area, take the time to spread the word about their ‘Save a Pet’ campaign – they need everyone to step up and help them change their future.

27
May

Is it just me, or is Ian Dunbar really hottie?





May

OMG! staff are contributing to our Facebook!

I work part-time for a large, bureaucratic animal welfare group.

They were a bit baffled by ‘The Facebook’, and knowing I’d been using the accounts since I started here, they asked me to explain how they were set up.

They have one ‘personal’ profile called, let’s say… ‘Fluffy Pets Rescue’

Which, once it was created, made a Fan Page called ‘Fluffy Pets Rescue’.

Oh NOooooo! they wailed! WE HAVE TWO ACCOUNTS?! This is a *disaster* we won’t know which one to contribute to!

No, that’s fine, I said. Being a organisation, you’ll just want to direct everyone to the Fan Page.

Now, I also have to tell you the volunteering department has an account called ‘Volunteer Manager’. This allows the volunteer department (me) to post updates to the Fan Page.

THREE ACCOUNTS?! they screeched, trying not to faint.

Yes, I said. In fact, I suggest that every department is issued an account so that they too can contribute to the Fan Page. Like you give each department an email.

We can’t give everyone an account or they will be creating folders and posting pictures and OMG!

But isn’t that what we were complaining about, not a month ago? That no one had the time to contribute to our Facebook regularly and it sat untouched?

But what about strategy! they wailed. Things will be getting cross posted and they’ll be on our Facebook and there WON’T BE ANY STRATEGY!

So determining that the staff cannot be trusted to represent themselves to the public (and ignoring the fact every one of us have an email and a phone) they swiftly directed all ancillary accounts be canceled. I’m still confused as to what they thought might be such a terrible contribution to the Fan Page. Happy photos of volunteers? Pictures from our events? Photos of boobs and penises? Certainly, all would have been very likely.

However, they returned the sacred Facebook login to the desk of the CEO, who is probably still a little too busy to contribute regularly, but whom has a full knowledge of the ’strategy’ and all is again safe.

Thank goodness for that.


May

Bendigo: a case study in cat management

Cat_Trap

Bendigo was one of the first Victorian councils to introduce cat management laws.

In the 2002/03 period the council impounded 534 cats, killing 338 of them. In 2004, they introduced a cat curfew, using the cat haters in the community to ‘teach cat owners a lesson’:

06 July 2004 – Residents will be on the front line of the City of Greater Bendigo’s cat curfew, officially introduced last night.

Under the plan, the council will supply cat traps to locals who notice a breach of the sunset-to-sunrise curfew.

Mayor Greg Williams said enforcement was not the primary reason for the curfew.”This is really about education and about getting people to do the right thing,” he said.


And by all accounts the program was an enormous ’success’, with a surge of impoundments and cat haters beating down the doors to get traps;

31 July 2004 – Record numbers of Bendigo cats were on death row yesterday, less than a month after the local council introduced a cat curfew.

Officials yesterday confirmed that the RSCPA animal shelter in East Bendigo had more than six times its usual number of cats waiting to be euthanised.

Shelter manager Fred Cameron said he had never seen so many cats abandoned in his 30 years in the job.

“This time of year, being cold and outside kitten season, we would probably have about 10 cats in cages.

“We have over 60. It has gone berserk.” Mr Cameron said fear of the fines was the main reason behind locals bringing in their cats.

“There are two reasons for this. A lot of the cats are being surrendered by their owners because of the cat curfew, and a lot are being brought in because neighbours are trapping cats,” he said. “Elderly people are probably getting a bit frightened that if their cats get out they will get into trouble.

“Hopefully, we can find owners for them.” Mr Cameron said he had heard council rangers were calling for reinforcements to deal with the increased work.

“The rangers are being run off their feet,” he said.

“I believe there is a waiting list for cat cages and they have ordered, and are expecting, another 12 cat traps.”


More info on the programs results from the Age;

Cat-hating residents are enthusiastically trapping their neighbours’ nocturnally roaming cats and sending them to the shelter. Meanwhile, some cat-owning residents – particularly the elderly – are so stressed at the prospect of the $51 fine they have voluntarily relinquished their kitties.

Since Bendigo’s curfew started, the pound has received 123 cats, up from 79 in June. Registered cats are returned to owners but the night-larking unclaimed moggies are put down after eight days if a suitable home is not found.

Fred Cameron, manager of the Bendigo RSPCA shelter, said most of the cats handed in were from neighbours’ traps. “The curfew sort of helped people who don’t get on with their neighbours to catch their cat and bring it in and get it impounded,” Mr Cameron said.


Supporters of these kinds of initiatives often say the surge dies down after the initial excitement of the trap happy masses. They claim shelter impound rates return to, not just normal levels, but lower as all the cats are removed from the streets.

So more than 6 years on, just how are the cats faring in Bendigo?

Unwanted felines face death
20 May, 2010

Kittens and cats are being put down at alarming rates at the Bendigo RSPCA shelter, as owners fail to take responsibility for their pets. According to statistics, supplied by the Victorian RSPCA, during 2008-09 the Bendigo shelter took in 1817 cats and 1243, or 68 per cent, were put down.


And what’s the reason?

An RSPCA spokesman said the high number in cats and kittens being put down was often due to very low microchip and registration rates.


Given that cats are still being impounded after years and years of trapping, and that the cats still entering Bendigo shelter at record levels have very ‘low microchip and registration rates’, is it such a stretch to believe that these cats, have never actually had an owner?

Study after study after study after study have shown that the shelter cat population is primarily driven by a self-sustaining, unowned population. Initiatives that target owners, rarely do more than put unowned cats in breach of some new ordinance and see them targeted for removal.

While it’s easy to blame an ‘irresponsible public’, it’s not proving to be a very effective technique for reducing shelter intakes, or saving the lives of cats.

26
May

How to save 79 pets in a week

Why do pets die in shelters? I no longer believe in the ‘too many pets, not enough homes’ reasoning because I can’t make the math of hundreds of pets being sold by pet shops, in the newspaper and on the internet each day, gel with the idea that no one wants the pets we have.

The myth that the public simply don’t want to adopt pound animals and that shelters are just ‘doing the dirty work of an irresponsible public’, was dealt another blow recently, when the ‘irresponsible public’ answered the call;

10 May 2010

Pounds inundated with dogs

The Fraser Coast Regional Council is being swamped with dogs caught wandering the streets of Hervey Bay and Maryborough.

Compliance Officer Gaye Ah Quay said 125 dogs had been picked up across the Fraser Coast by the Council’s compliance officers during the last three weeks and only 46 could be identified and returned to their owners.

“That has left us with 79 dogs to re-home which is going to be extremely difficult,” she said.


17th May 2010

Public keen to house unwanted pets

THERE has been a fantastic response from the Fraser Coast public to an influx of unwanted dogs into the Coast’s pounds.

Pancake, Puffy, Two Tone, Roxy, Snowy, Foxy and Sam all have new homes and Bluey and Red are hopeful after a fantastic response from the Fraser Coast public to an influx of unwanted dogs into the Coast’s pounds.

A crowd of people was waiting at the pound gates yesterday, keen to adopt their pick of the 79 dogs needing homes while other people rang offering temporary accommodation for the animals until a home could be found.

Fraser Coast council compliance officer Sally Cripps said the compliance officers were overwhelmed with the response and expected to re-home most of the dogs and several cats.

“It is fantastic to see that so many people care about these animals and are willing to step up when they know there is a need.”

Fraser_Coast

Fraser Coast residents have been willing to adopt pets from local pounds.


I don’t understand why we’re constantly surprised that, when instead of blaming the public for killing, we reach out to them for assistance and they come forward to help us. Thousands pour into the Million Paws Walk, hundreds open their wallets when they hear about a single abused pet and dozens open their homes and their hearts each time a group of pets are saved from a puppy farm.

It’s time to reject the old mantras that the public are our problem and start believing that they are our allies in the fight against shelter pet killing. Whether you believe it possible or not, if we are ever to overcome the “not enough homes” part of our problem, we have to stop denigrating the communities we’re meant to be in partnership with.

Your community does care. They will help you if you ask them to and show them how.

25
May

What would happen if we spent $4million dollars on rescue pet awareness?


Get ready to find out!

————————–

Pedigree teams up with PetRescue

SYDNEY: Pet brand Pedigree is set to launch a $4 million campaign for its 2010 Pedigree Adoption Drive in partnership with rescue organisation PetRescue.

Designed to pull on the emotional heartstrings of all Australians, the campaign takes in TV, print, online, digital, PR, and point of sale to highlight the 100,000 unwanted dogs which are euthanased every year because homes can’t be found.

Pedigree brand manager Ryan Buckle said the campaign was part of the brand’s global positioning to make the world a better place for dogs.

“At Pedigree we believe that every dog should be fed well and have a good home. We do this by offering them the best value supermarket brand pet food, and championing initiatives such as The Pedigree Adoption Drive with our partner PetRescue.”

Creative agency Whybin\TBWA will drive the TV and print execution, media agency Starcom has booked the media schedule, which includes a partnership with Channel 7 and AFL sponsorship with sporting ambassador Western Bulldogs captain Brad Johnson.

Whybin\TBWA will also work with Digital Democracy to launch a website to encourage Australians to either adopt a homeless dog, donate online or buy Pedigree, with proceeds going to PetRescue.

The campaign will also launch the Dog Adoption Index, a report into the issue of Dog Homelessness in Australia, in collaboration with PetRescue and celebrity ambassadors Tom Williams and Myf Wharhurst and will feature a ‘Yellow Dog Day’ event on 4 June, created by Ambient, which will see yellow dogs appear across Australian capital cities.

Pedigree saves rescue dogs


24
May

How to save a pet in 2hrs


A man walks into your shelter and drops off a canary in a box. Do you

a) recognise that you don’t have any aviary facilities, so do the ‘kindest thing’ and kill the bird. The man should have been a more responsible owner!

or

b) post the bird to your Facebook fan page of over 10,000 members offering him ‘free to great family’ and have a new home before COB?

Picture 11

Picture 12



The internet is changing everything.

I presented on this topic at last year’s NDN conference. But the potential just keeps growing



23
May

How the New Zealanders zoomed past us in the race to No Kill



The New Zealanders might have just overtaken Australia in the race to modernised animal sheltering industry.

Over 125 years ago, New Zealand opened its first Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, or SPCA. Today, proving that even an ‘old’ organisation can lead the way in modern thinking, they have pledged their dedication to a No Kill future for New Zealand.

The Saving Lives philosophy is that every life is precious, and with that philosophy comes the need to help every animal into the fulfilment of life, so long as its quality of life is preserved.


Calling their program ‘Saving Lives’ rather than ‘No Kill’, they reaffirm that they are in the “business of saving lives” and call on their staff to “becomes passionately committed to supporting its philosophy” and “accept the philosophy that Saving Lives is totally achievable”.

But this isn’t just feel-good piffle. To move towards their No Kill goals, they first had to take a long hard look at their policies, identifying the common causes of shelter killing, and take audit of each one’s validity.

One of the major breakthoughs from this audit, was the identification of a cultural problem with exisiting euthanasia protocols. Rather than use the protocols to make compassionate decisions, the documentation and policies had become a way to defend killing and absolve individuals of the responsibility.

The new model asked people to step up and be more than just a ‘rule follower’;

Accountability allows, and indeed requires, flexibility. Too many SPCA centres lose sight of this principle, staying rigid with their protocols, believing they are engraved in stone. They are not.

Where protocols are important because they ensure accountability, protocols without flexibility can have the opposite effect by stifling innovation, causing lives to be needlessly lost, and allowing those who fail to save lives an excuse as to why they failed.”


The organisation’s pledge to maintain protocols and procedures orientated towards preserving life, means they must find solutions to the common reasons for shelter killing.

Beyond killing

Health

“Cat flu is not a reason to kill cats”.

By referring to cat flu as ’snuffles’, a normal and preventable part of caring for shelter cats, the group was able to take a scientific, rather than defensive, approach to managing illness;

In an eight-year study conducted in Auckland, approximately 40% of incoming cats developed ’snuffles’ (in the first year of the survey). Various methods, including efforts to reduce the stressful environment, in addition to cleaning regimes, have reduced this figure to 25%. With the development of isolation areas providing the opportunity to treat those affected, the success rate for treatment has increased from 34% (annual average) to 61%, while euthanasia of snuffles sufferers has dropped from 24% to 3% in the treatment area.

These figures clearly indicate that a combination of stress-free environments, cleaning regimes, strict isolation areas and the correct medical treatment can have a direct effect on saving lives from “snuffles”.


“Ringworm is not a reason to kill animals”. Describing ringworm as a ‘nuisance’ rather than a deadly disease, but recognising ringworm passed to the public is a publicity nightmare, the group recommends the following;

The use of foster homes is ideal in isolating ringworm from an SPCA centre. However, such fosterers need to be dedicated to the task and, due to the length of treatment, are “put out of action” for the fostering of other animals for a lengthy period of time. The use of off-site adoption events to rehome these animals will ensure that they do not return ringworm to the centre.


The use of a team of ’special needs’ foster carers, coupled with a healthy, stress-free environment, strict isolation and treatment regimes mean a commitment that pets with ringworm will be saved.

The group also treat skin conditions (flea allergies and mange) either on site, or in foster. By offering full disclosure and treatment plans to new adopters, pets with skin conditions are able to finish their recovery in their new homes.

Temperament

Pets entering shelters, by definition, have varying backgrounds and requirements for care. The organisation pledge to help all animals, regardless of their condition;

If we are to save lives we need to cater to these special problems by providing facilities that can attend to their needs and, of equal importance, that involve rehabilitation methods requiring the expertise of those qualified to provide the help needed to restore them to normality.


When referring to cats, ‘feral’ is not in the group’s vocabulary.

By definition, “feral” cats do not have contact with or dependency on humans. Accordingly, centres are very unlikely to receive genuine “feral” cats.

Incoming stray cats will normally be abandoned previously owned companion cats or possibly cats from colonies. Either way, they will not appreciate being trapped and will show their displeasure in no uncertain terms. For this reason they are described (incorrectly) as “feral”, when in fact they are “wild” (unused to handling, resenting capture, possibly never domesticated), “scared” (frightened by their captivity and uncertain of their future), or “timid” (naturally mistrusting and unsure).

Such cats deserve the chance to live, and should be given the opportunity to adjust and relax a little over a few days rather than being hastily dispatched.


Dogs get a similar level of respect, with the recognition that the behaviour of dogs is a product of their previous environment and that with time, patience and training – most dogs with perceived temperament problems can be successfully adopted.

Any temperament assessment should be aimed at “getting to know the dog” and whether any behavioural problems might exist that can be treated, rather than being aimed at putting it to the final test to determine its ultimate fate.


Additional to “on-site” facilities, rehabilitation of behavioural problems, particularly with dogs, will include the input of independent and professional individuals.

The variety of temperament problems may call for different advice, from either a veterinarian or a behaviourist.

Correct behaviour adjustment techniques can be taught to staff/volunteers, which can prove a very real asset in the operation of a centre, resulting in the correct and professional handling of animals while in our care.


Age

Recognising the importance of foster care in saving underage animals, this organisation engages the compassion of community;

The inability to save healthy young animals reflects badly on us as a welfare organisation, particularly when there are so many people in the community who would gladly volunteer themselves and their homes to foster the young until ready for adoption.



…………………………….

Getting pets out of shelters

Along with a requirement to overcome killing as a method of managing shelter pets, the organisation also needed to get those pets they have, out of the shelter.

Pet retention strategies

The Saving Lives philosophy calls for a willingness to work with people to help them solve their problems, with the sole aim of keeping people and their companion animals together. In our ethos of “prevention” we need to be seen as a place that people can turn to for advice and assistance, and we need to respond to that. to solve problems


Identifying that the very first call for help is an opportunity for the shelter to lend assistance, the organisation works to develop relationships with local trainers, veterinarians and behaviouralists. These relationships are symbiotic, generating new clients for these businesses, and expanding the knowledge base of the shelter, though simple training for staff.

There is discussion about the development of a general national call number for people with pet problems in the future,

Desexing

High-volume, low cost desexing is at the heart of any successful life-saving programme to substantially reduce the number of unwanted births, and the number of animals surrendered to SPCA centres.

It is fair to say that a proactive high-volume, low/no cost desexing programme is the best investment any centre can make in the fight to save future lives.


Along with community desexing clinic, the organisation desexes all animals before adoption and seeks the support from local council animal management for desexing initiatives. Free, targeted desexing for at-risk pets in low income areas, desexing vouchers for semi-owned cat owners, mobile desexing facilities and proactive education campaigns bring the benefits of desexing to all pets in the community.

An effective desexing programme has been proven in many cities internationally to virtually halve the centre incoming animal population within a decade of its introduction missed.


Improving reclaims

A focus on the importance of microchipping. All adopted pets are chipped and the organisation run ’snip and chip’ promotions.

The requirement that all animals are scanned and that pet owners are contacted promptly. They also list found pets on the internet.

Maximising adoptions

Focusing on promoting the benefits to the adoption of shelter animals:

- unique ‘feel good’ factor
- the use of the term ‘orphan’ rather than ’stray’
- great value (desexed, vaccinated, microchipped)

They also make the following requirement of their shelters:

SPCA facilities should be a great place to visit, with staff/volunteers happy and helpful professional people who are keen to assist as best they can because they want to, not only for the people they are serving but also for the animals they are dedicated to saving.

Adoption areas need to be clean and contain contented, well-presented animals in bright and airy surroundings, rather than the “prison behind bars” that the public envisage we are. Public facilities in cared-for grounds and surroundings must abound, to help add to the enjoyment
of their visit to the SPCA.


Hosting adoption areas with staff/volunteers who are helpful and knowledgeable is essential. Make sure that staff/volunteers are easily recognisable with suitable clothing and name tags.

There is nothing worse than having the public looking for animals when there is no one they can find to help them with their selection.


They ask that shelters name the pet to engage potential adopters (even if the animal is a stray) and that an information sheet is provided on the animal. These sheets are designed to accentuate the positive (“Not good with children” becomes “good with adults”) and all pets must be ready for adoption (behavioural and health problems resolved).

Opening hours must be convenient for potential adopters, including seven-day-a-week adoptions and early evening opening hours. They also endeavour to provide a wide range of animals:

A centre with a wide choice of animals is a successful centre, providing variety for “discerning shoppers”. If low on animals, source them from elsewhere (other SPCAs, pounds, rescue groups, etc).


Dogs being walked, all wear ‘adopt me’ jackets to attract attention and a database of people looking for a particular ‘kind’ of animal is kept. Profiles of adoptable animals are also posted to the web.

Price is presented as a recouping of a set amount of ‘adoption costs’ and special pricing promotions are used to attract adopters. ‘Two for the price of one’ kittens, special pet care giveaways, free food promotions.

A ‘14 day’ guarantee, helps adopted pets stay in their homes:

Inevitably, some animals (particularly cats) may be slow to adapt to their new surroundings, and may even become stressed, bringing on other “ailments”.

New “owners” are generally nervous and may panic at such behaviour, often rushing off to their vet for advice and incurring associated costs which they may endeavour to recover from the SPCA.

Provide a 14-day period where the animal will be covered for any associated costs at a set ceiling price (say, $50) at your expense. You will find that few people will claim this and, by setting a maximum, considerable money will in the end be saved from over-exuberant vets and anxious “owners”!


Off-site adoptions

Adoption vehicles in shopping centre car parks and outside pet shops or the use of retail space, display pets for adoption. Partnerships with local businesses can help get pets ’seen’, and off-site adoption attracts people who may not even be considering adopting an animal.

Where this has been practiced, it has been noted that off-site adoptions can account for between 20% and 40% of total adoptions achieved, and accordingly is well worth the effort.


These promotions not only raise awareness, but are a great opportunity to fund raise.

Working with rescue groups

There are a large number of animal welfare groups and individuals who, in their own way, undertake the rescue and rehoming of many animals and to whom we should look to assist us in our mission of saving lives.

These groups and individuals should not be viewed as “the competition” (as is sometimes the case), rather they should be seen as allies undertaking the same work for the same reasons we do. For, as long as unnecessary killing occurs in our own centre, rare would be the case where we would not utilise their assistance in taking custody of and rehoming those animals we have whose life is at risk.

Get to know them all, and work with them to save lives.


Working with foster homes

Proactive recruitment of foster carers, advanced levels of support and training opportunities and a positive regard for the contribution they make is vital to the success of their foster care program;

Training, equipment, food, litter and any medication required are all supplied by the SPCA to its foster homes, and a full support network of helpful staff or volunteer supervisors is also important to the programme. Keeping our fosterers happy is as important as keeping our animals happy!


They also offer innovative foster programs, like ’seniors for seniors’ and the adoption of foster pets by the foster homes.

Working with volunteers

Volunteers have been described as a dedicated “army of compassion” and are the backbone of a successful centre operation.


The organisation engage volunteers for animal care, but also public interaction and adoption support.

…fortunately there are a large number of people who gladly give of their time to help animals – however, we need to ask them, train them, assign duties to them and look after them.


Saving the strays

There are a vast number of people who voluntarily tend to stray cats in the community, normally in a “cat colony” (which can be small or large) or in a controlled situation or on their own property. Such cats were mostly once companion cats who have been abandoned, while some are the offspring of those cats who were not desexed prior to abandonment. They assemble in colonies, requiring the support and assistance of humans for their ongoing sustenance and welfare.

These people are dedicated to their task, spending many hours (and much of their own money) to care for these cats. Their sole objective is to save lives, and accordingly they are an essential part of this programme and deserving of our full support.


Recognising the contribution of community cat carers is vital to reducing intakes and the number of cats dying in shelters. This organisation embraces their work and offers them the support they need to continue in their life-saving work.

They formed the ‘Cat Coalition’, assisting with donated food and desexing vouchers and support to manage problems as they arise. The coalition members, in addition to being supported, also operate under protocols designed with the ongoing welfare of the cats and their care in mind.

They expanded the program to include those people looking to surrender a ’stray’ cat. Rather than accept a fractious cat from a surendee’s own property, the organisation offers the chance to adopt the cat as a ‘barn cat’, have it desexed and save its life.
………………….

No Kill is about what you DO, do

This organisation has taken on every aspect of the No Kill equation, and reclaimed its role as a life-saving resource in the community. What their experience has shown is that No Kill isn’t about what you don’t do (kill), but what you do, do… execute a series of proven, modern animal sheltering techniques that simply run in a contrary manner to convenience killing.

The fact that one of the oldest and largest animal welfare organisations in the country has taken the lead in moving New Zealand towards its No Kill future, is testament to the dynamic leadership of the organisation (see my previous article on Bob Kerridge from the SPCA here).

The ‘Saving Lives’ plan from the SPCA New Zealand could be rolled out in any shelter tomorrow.

It’s time that every Australian demands the same level of performance from our own animal welfare groups and seek out and support those organisations who are already on a No Kill path.

Australian shelter pets also deserve a No Kill future.